Gaza Flotilla Incident Case
Jurisdiction | Germany |
Judgment Date | 29 September 2014 |
Court | Federal Supreme Court (Germany) |
Docket Number | (Case No 3 ARP 77/10-4) |
Date | 29 September 2014 |
Decision Not to Instigate Investigations Germany, Federal Prosecutor General.
(Case No 3 ARP 77/10-4)
War and armed conflict — International armed conflict — Noninternational armed conflict — Status of armed conflict — Law of armed conflict — Armed conflict at sea — Whether armed conflict between non-State organization and Israel — Terrorism — Use of terrorist methods — Relevance — Prerequisites for determining existence of armed conflict — Whether necessary to determine whether armed conflict international or non-international in character — Distinction between war crime and ordinary crime — War crimes — Nexus requirement — Attack in law governing conduct of hostilities — Military objective — Law governing armed conflict at sea — Right to a naval blockade — Status of merchant vessel breaching naval blockade — Status of goods on merchant vessel breaching naval blockade — Contraband — Enforcement of naval blockade on high seas — Naval blockade in law of international armed conflict — Non-international armed conflict — Whether power to impose a naval blockade applicable — Distinction between members of non-State organized armed groups and civilians — Journalists and war correspondents — Civilian taking a direct part in hostilities — Proportionality — International criminal law — Humanitarian assistance and peacekeeping missions — Wilfully causing great suffering and serious injury to body or health — Deportation and forcible transfer — Humiliating and degrading treatment — Unjustifiably delaying return home of a person detained after enforcement of naval blockade — Pillaging and unlawfully destroying, appropriating or seizing property — Crimes against humanity — Contextual element of widespread or systematic attack against any civilian population — Person hors de combat in law of armed conflict and international criminal law — Whether criminal investigation to be instigated — Whether sufficient reason to believe crime committed to detriment of German and non-German nationals
International criminal law — War crimes — Crimes against humanity — Law of armed conflict — Armed conflict at sea — Humanitarian assistance and peacekeeping missions — Wilfully causing great suffering and serious injury to body or health — Deportation and forcible transfer — Humiliating and degrading treatment — Unjustifiably delaying return home of a person detained after enforcement of naval blockade — Pillaging and unlawfully destroying, appropriating or seizing property — Crimes against humanity — Contextual element of widespread or systematic attack against any civilian population — Person hors decombat — Whether criminal investigation to be instigated — Whether sufficient reason to believe crime committed to detriment of German and non-German nationals
Sea — Armed conflict at sea — Treaties — Customary international law — Right to a naval blockade — Legal prerequisites — Status of merchant vessel breaching naval blockade — Status of goods on merchant vessel breaching naval blockade — Contraband — Enforcement of naval blockade on high seas — Naval blockade in law of armed conflict — Whether power to impose a naval blockade applicable — Whether criminal investigation to be instigated — Whether sufficient reason to believe crime committed to detriment of German and non-German nationals
Jurisdiction — Universal jurisdiction — Extraterritorial jurisdiction in case of attack on marine traffic — Passive personality principle — Law of Germany including discretion not to exercise universal jurisdiction — Immunity from foreign criminal jurisdiction — The law of Germany
Summary:1The facts:—On 31 May 2010, Israeli armed forces took action, on the high seas, against six vessels of the so-called Gaza flotilla, including, in particular, the Comoros-flagged vessel Mavi Marmara, in order to enforce the Israeli naval blockade of the Gaza Strip. Israel's attempt to board the Mavi Marmara met with significant armed resistance and in the course of the resulting violence nine people were killed and at least 55 injured.
A criminal complaint was lodged with the Federal Prosecutor General against unknown members of the Israel Defense Forces by three German nationals who, together with at least seven more German nationals, were on
board the Mavi Marmara on 31 May 2010. Further complaints were lodged with different local German police departments by a German journalist and by a German-based Italian journalist who, on 31 May 2010, had both been on board the vessel Eleftheri Mesogeios which was also part of the Gaza flotilla.The Gaza Strip, previously under Egyptian administration, was occupied by Israel following the Six Day War of June 1967. From then until 1982, the Gaza Strip was administered, initially by Israeli military commanders and, subsequently, by a “Civil administration” established by the Israeli armed forces. The Gaza Strip then became, together with the other occupied territories, the object of the Oslo I (1993) and the Gaza–Jericho (1994) agreements, entrusting various degrees of administrative responsibility to the newly created Palestinian Authority. The Oslo II Accord (1995) integrated these two agreements and provided a new treaty basis for Israeli–Palestinian relations. As part of its implementation, Israel Defense Forces retreated from the Gaza Strip, except for the location of Israeli settlements, main access routes to these settlements, and military installations along the southern border of the Gaza Strip with Egypt.
In September 2000, an uprising of the population in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank began. This violence, in view of a first uprising having occurred during 1987 and 1993, became widely referred to as the Second Intifada. It included cross-border rocket attacks from the Gaza Strip and Israeli military reactions. By December 2008, the conflict had resulted in the death of 5,500 Palestinians (593 of whom were killed as a result of intra-Palestinian violence), 1,062 Israelis and 64 foreigners.
In October 2004, the Knesset endorsed the Israeli Government's “Disengagement Plan” involving dismantling the Israeli settlements in the Gaza Strip and the withdrawal of Israel's security forces. The implementation of the plan was completed by September 2005. Beyond that date, Israel continued to exercise control over the borders, coastline and airspace of the Gaza Strip.
By June 2007, the Hamas organization established control over the Gaza Strip. It operated through a political bureau that directed its military wing, which consisted of various paramilitary units including combat troops, trained in the Gaza Strip and abroad and heavily armed. On 19 September 2007, Israel declared the Gaza Strip hostile territory and restricted the movement of goods into and out of Gaza as well as the movement of persons for security reasons. Throughout most of 2008, hostile acts were exchanged across the line between Israel and the Gaza Strip. Between 27 December 2008 and 18 January 2009, Israel conducted a large-scale military operation, called “Cast Lead”, against Hamas members and facilities in the Gaza Strip. Between “Cast Lead” and May 2010, there was an incessant exchange of hostile acts between Hamas and Israel.
On 3 January 2009, the Israeli Minister of Defence ordered a naval blockade off the coastline of the Gaza Strip as part of “Cast Lead” in order to prevent the coastline being used as a possible route for military supplies to Hamas. In implementing this order, the 20 nautical miles of the sea territory off the Gaza coastline was, through various channels, declared a restricted zone. This blockade was subsequently enforced on a number of occasions. At the same time, Israel declared that it would allow humanitarian assistance to the population of the Gaza Strip through the land route after verification in the Israeli port of Ashdod.
The Free Gaza Movement was a pro-Palestinian organization based in Nicosia. Its aim was to display solidarity with the population in the Gaza Strip and to draw international attention to that population's dire living conditions. The movement cooperated with a number of other non-governmental organizations to set up a flotilla to break the naval blockade of the Gaza Strip, thereby attracting attention from international media to the situation in the Gaza Strip. Consequently, there were many journalists on board vessels in the Gaza flotilla. The delivery of humanitarian assistance through this flotilla was of secondary importance. The Mavi Marmara, which was a passenger vessel and the largest vessel of the flotilla, was contributed by a Turkish organization (“the İHH”) which, at the time, was banned in Israel because of its alleged support for Hamas. On 30 and 31 May 2010, 575 persons were on board the Mavi Marmara, including the 29 crew members and 382 Turkish nationals. The 40 persons who were located on its upper deck throughout belonged to the ÍHH.
Israel's diplomatic efforts to prevent the flotilla from sailing were unsuccessful. The flotilla set course to the Gaza Strip from the meeting point at the high seas off Gaza's coastline on 30 May. While Israel's defence forces prepared for the possible interception of the flotilla, those on board its vessels were determined to pursue their course. The persons on the upper deck of the Mavi Marmara, in particular, equipped themselves with various weapons. Other passengers were instructed in peaceful resistance. Calls by Israel for the flotilla to change course were refused and Israel ended transmissions. Israel's operation against the flotilla began on 31 May while the flotilla was still on the high seas, 72 nautical miles off the coast. An initial attempt to board the Mavi Marmara proved unsuccessful. The Israeli navy then used helicopters to land soldiers on board. Whether or not live ammunition was used by Israel during this early phase...
Um weiterzulesen
Jetzt Kostenlos StartenVollständigen Zugriff mit einer kostenlosen 7-Tage-Testversion freischalten
Verändern Sie Ihre juristische Recherche mit vLex
-
Vollständiger Zugriff auf die größte Sammlung von Common-Law-Rechtsprechung auf einer einzigen Plattform
-
Erstellen Sie KI-generierte Fallzusammenfassungen, die wichtige rechtliche Fragen sofort hervorheben
-
Erweiterte Suchfunktionen mit präzisen Filter- und Sortieroptionen
-
Umfassende juristische Inhalte mit Dokumenten aus über 100 Gerichtsbarkeiten
-
Vertraut von 2 Millionen Fachleuten, einschließlich führender internationaler Kanzleien
-
Greifen Sie auf KI-gestützte Recherche mit Vincent AI zu: Suchanfragen in natürlicher Sprache mit verifizierten Zitaten

Vollständigen Zugriff mit einer kostenlosen 7-Tage-Testversion freischalten
Verändern Sie Ihre juristische Recherche mit vLex
-
Vollständiger Zugriff auf die größte Sammlung von Common-Law-Rechtsprechung auf einer einzigen Plattform
-
Erstellen Sie KI-generierte Fallzusammenfassungen, die wichtige rechtliche Fragen sofort hervorheben
-
Erweiterte Suchfunktionen mit präzisen Filter- und Sortieroptionen
-
Umfassende juristische Inhalte mit Dokumenten aus über 100 Gerichtsbarkeiten
-
Vertraut von 2 Millionen Fachleuten, einschließlich führender internationaler Kanzleien
-
Greifen Sie auf KI-gestützte Recherche mit Vincent AI zu: Suchanfragen in natürlicher Sprache mit verifizierten Zitaten

Vollständigen Zugriff mit einer kostenlosen 7-Tage-Testversion freischalten
Verändern Sie Ihre juristische Recherche mit vLex
-
Vollständiger Zugriff auf die größte Sammlung von Common-Law-Rechtsprechung auf einer einzigen Plattform
-
Erstellen Sie KI-generierte Fallzusammenfassungen, die wichtige rechtliche Fragen sofort hervorheben
-
Erweiterte Suchfunktionen mit präzisen Filter- und Sortieroptionen
-
Umfassende juristische Inhalte mit Dokumenten aus über 100 Gerichtsbarkeiten
-
Vertraut von 2 Millionen Fachleuten, einschließlich führender internationaler Kanzleien
-
Greifen Sie auf KI-gestützte Recherche mit Vincent AI zu: Suchanfragen in natürlicher Sprache mit verifizierten Zitaten

Vollständigen Zugriff mit einer kostenlosen 7-Tage-Testversion freischalten
Verändern Sie Ihre juristische Recherche mit vLex
-
Vollständiger Zugriff auf die größte Sammlung von Common-Law-Rechtsprechung auf einer einzigen Plattform
-
Erstellen Sie KI-generierte Fallzusammenfassungen, die wichtige rechtliche Fragen sofort hervorheben
-
Erweiterte Suchfunktionen mit präzisen Filter- und Sortieroptionen
-
Umfassende juristische Inhalte mit Dokumenten aus über 100 Gerichtsbarkeiten
-
Vertraut von 2 Millionen Fachleuten, einschließlich führender internationaler Kanzleien
-
Greifen Sie auf KI-gestützte Recherche mit Vincent AI zu: Suchanfragen in natürlicher Sprache mit verifizierten Zitaten

Vollständigen Zugriff mit einer kostenlosen 7-Tage-Testversion freischalten
Verändern Sie Ihre juristische Recherche mit vLex
-
Vollständiger Zugriff auf die größte Sammlung von Common-Law-Rechtsprechung auf einer einzigen Plattform
-
Erstellen Sie KI-generierte Fallzusammenfassungen, die wichtige rechtliche Fragen sofort hervorheben
-
Erweiterte Suchfunktionen mit präzisen Filter- und Sortieroptionen
-
Umfassende juristische Inhalte mit Dokumenten aus über 100 Gerichtsbarkeiten
-
Vertraut von 2 Millionen Fachleuten, einschließlich führender internationaler Kanzleien
-
Greifen Sie auf KI-gestützte Recherche mit Vincent AI zu: Suchanfragen in natürlicher Sprache mit verifizierten Zitaten
